On the Adequateness of the Connection Method
Abstract
Roughly speaking, adequatness is the property of a theorem proving method to solve simpler problems faster than more difficult ones. Au-tomated inferencing methods are often not ade-quate as they require thousands of steps to solve problems which humans solve effortlessly, sponta-neously, and with remarkable efficiency. L. Shastri and V. Ajjanagadde- who call this gap the ar-tificial intelligence paradox- suggest that their connectionist inference system is a first step to-ward bridging this gap. In this paper we show that their inference method is equivalent to rea-soning by reductions in the well-known connec-tion method. In particular, we extend a reduction
Cite
Text
Beringer and Hölldobler. "On the Adequateness of the Connection Method." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.Markdown
[Beringer and Hölldobler. "On the Adequateness of the Connection Method." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1993/beringer1993aaai-adequateness/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{beringer1993aaai-adequateness,
title = {{On the Adequateness of the Connection Method}},
author = {Beringer, Antje and Hölldobler, Steffen},
booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1993},
pages = {9-14},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1993/beringer1993aaai-adequateness/}
}