Minimal Belief and Negation as Failure: A Feasible Approach
Abstract
Lifschitz introduced a logic of minimal belief and negation as failure, called mbnf, in order to provide a theory of epistemic queries to nonmonotonic databases. We present a feasible subsystem of mbnf which can be translated into a logic built on first order logic and negation as failure, called fonf. We give a semantics for fonf along with an extended connection calculus. In particular, we demonstrate that the obtained system is still more expressive than other approaches. Introduction Lifschitz [ 1991; 1992 ] 1 introduced a logic of minimal belief and negation as failure, mbnf, in order to provide a theory of epistemic queries to nonmonotonic databases. This approach deals with self-knowledge and ignorance as well as default information. From one perspective, mbnf relies on concepts developed by Levesque [ 1984 ] and Reiter [ 1990 ] for database query evaluation. In these approaches, databases are treated as first order theories, whereas queries may also contain an epistemic mo...
Cite
Text
Beringer and Schaub. "Minimal Belief and Negation as Failure: A Feasible Approach." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.Markdown
[Beringer and Schaub. "Minimal Belief and Negation as Failure: A Feasible Approach." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1993/beringer1993aaai-minimal/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{beringer1993aaai-minimal,
title = {{Minimal Belief and Negation as Failure: A Feasible Approach}},
author = {Beringer, Antje and Schaub, Torsten},
booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1993},
pages = {400-405},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1993/beringer1993aaai-minimal/}
}