Activity Analysis: The Qualitative Analysis of Stationary Points for Optimal Reasoning

Abstract

We present a theory of a modeler's problem decomposition skills in the context of optimal reasoning --- the use of qualitative modeling to strategically guide numerical explorations of objective space. Our technique, called activity analysis, applies to the pervasive family of linear and non-linear, constrained optimization problems, and easily integrates with any existing numerical approach. Activity analysis draws from the power of two seemingly divergent perspectives -- the global conflict-based approaches of combinatorial satisficing search, and the local gradientbased approaches of continuous optimization -- combined with the underlying insights of engineering monotonicity analysis. The result is an approach that strategically cuts away subspaces that it can quickly rule out as suboptimal, and then guides the numerical methods to the remaining subspaces. Introduction and Example Our goal is to capture a modeler's tacit skill at decomposing physical models and its application to...

Cite

Text

Williams and Cagan. "Activity Analysis: The Qualitative Analysis of Stationary Points for Optimal Reasoning." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1994.

Markdown

[Williams and Cagan. "Activity Analysis: The Qualitative Analysis of Stationary Points for Optimal Reasoning." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1994.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1994/williams1994aaai-activity/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{williams1994aaai-activity,
  title     = {{Activity Analysis: The Qualitative Analysis of Stationary Points for Optimal Reasoning}},
  author    = {Williams, Brian C. and Cagan, Jonathan},
  booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {1994},
  pages     = {1217-1223},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1994/williams1994aaai-activity/}
}