Case-Based Similarity Assessment: Estimating Adaptability from Experience

Abstract

Case-based problem-solving systems rely on similarity assessment to select stored cases whose solutions are easily adaptable to fit current problems. However, widely-used similarity assessment strategies, such as evaluation of semantic similarity, can be poor predictors of adaptability. As a result, systems may select cases that are difficult or impossible for them to adapt, even when easily adaptable cases are available in memory. This paper presents a new similarity assessment approach which couples similarity judgments directly to a case library containing the system's adaptation knowledge. It examines this approach in the context of a case-based planning system that learns both new plans and new adaptations. Empirical tests of alternative similarity assessment strategies show that this approach enables better case selection and increases the benefits accrued from learned adaptations. Introduction Case-based problem-solving solves new problems by retrieving and adapting the solutio...

Cite

Text

Leake et al. "Case-Based Similarity Assessment: Estimating Adaptability from Experience." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1997.

Markdown

[Leake et al. "Case-Based Similarity Assessment: Estimating Adaptability from Experience." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1997.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1997/leake1997aaai-case/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{leake1997aaai-case,
  title     = {{Case-Based Similarity Assessment: Estimating Adaptability from Experience}},
  author    = {Leake, David B. and Kinley, Andrew and Wilson, David C.},
  booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {1997},
  pages     = {674-679},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/1997/leake1997aaai-case/}
}