Reviewing the Design of DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web
Abstract
In the current Syntactic uninterpreted syntactic constructs are given meaning only by private off-line agreements that are inaccessible to computers. In the Semantic Web vision, this is replaced by a web where both data and its semantic definition are accessible and manipulable by computer software. DAML+OIL is an ontology language specifically designed for this use in the Web; it exploits existing Web standards (XML and RDF), adding the familiar ontological primitives of object oriented and frame based systems, and the formal rigor of a very expressive description logic. The definition of DAML+OIL is now over a year old, and the language has been in fairly widespread use. In this paper, we review DAML+OIL's relation with its key ingredients (XML, RDF, OIL, DAML-ONT, Description Logics), we discuss the design decisions and trade-offs that were the basis for the language definition, and identify a number of implementation challenges posed by the current language. These issues are important for designers of other representation languages for the Semantic Web, be they competitors or successors of DAML+OIL, such as the language currently under definition by W3C.
Cite
Text
Horrocks et al. "Reviewing the Design of DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002. doi:10.5555/777092.777214Markdown
[Horrocks et al. "Reviewing the Design of DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2002/horrocks2002aaai-reviewing/) doi:10.5555/777092.777214BibTeX
@inproceedings{horrocks2002aaai-reviewing,
title = {{Reviewing the Design of DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web}},
author = {Horrocks, Ian and Patel-Schneider, Peter F. and van Harmelen, Frank},
booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2002},
pages = {792-797},
doi = {10.5555/777092.777214},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2002/horrocks2002aaai-reviewing/}
}