Private and Third-Party Randomization in Risk-Sensitive Equilibrium Concepts
Abstract
We consider risk-sensitive generalizations of Nash and correlated equilibria in noncooperative games. We prove that, except for a class of degenerate games, unless a two-player game has a pure Nash equilibrium, it does not have a risk-sensitive Nash equilibrium. We also show that every game has a risk-sensitive correlated equilibrium. The striking contrast between these existence results is due to the different sources of randomization in Nash (private randomization) and correlated equilibria (third-party randomization).
Cite
Text
Brautbar et al. "Private and Third-Party Randomization in Risk-Sensitive Equilibrium Concepts." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2010. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V24I1.7634Markdown
[Brautbar et al. "Private and Third-Party Randomization in Risk-Sensitive Equilibrium Concepts." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2010.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2010/brautbar2010aaai-private/) doi:10.1609/AAAI.V24I1.7634BibTeX
@inproceedings{brautbar2010aaai-private,
title = {{Private and Third-Party Randomization in Risk-Sensitive Equilibrium Concepts}},
author = {Brautbar, Mickey and Kearns, Michael J. and Syed, Umar},
booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2010},
pages = {723-728},
doi = {10.1609/AAAI.V24I1.7634},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2010/brautbar2010aaai-private/}
}