Teaching Classification Boundaries to Humans

Abstract

Given a classification task, what is the best way to teach the resulting boundary to a human? While machine learning techniques can provide excellent methods for finding the boundary, including the selection of examples in an online setting, they tell us little about how we would teach a human the same task. We propose to investigate the problem of example selection and presentation in the context of teaching humans, and explore a variety of mechanisms in the interests of finding what may work best. In particular, we begin with the baseline of random presentation and then examine combinations of several mechanisms: the indication of an example’s relative difficulty, the use of the shaping heuristic from the cognitive science literature (moving from easier examples to harder ones), and a novel kernel-based “coverage model” of the subject’s mastery of the task. From our experiments on 54 human subjects learning and performing a pair of synthetic classification tasks via our teaching system, we found that we can achieve the greatest gains with a combination of shaping and the coverage model.

Cite

Text

Basu and Christensen. "Teaching Classification Boundaries to Humans." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V27I1.8623

Markdown

[Basu and Christensen. "Teaching Classification Boundaries to Humans." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2013/basu2013aaai-teaching/) doi:10.1609/AAAI.V27I1.8623

BibTeX

@inproceedings{basu2013aaai-teaching,
  title     = {{Teaching Classification Boundaries to Humans}},
  author    = {Basu, Sumit and Christensen, Janara},
  booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2013},
  pages     = {109-115},
  doi       = {10.1609/AAAI.V27I1.8623},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2013/basu2013aaai-teaching/}
}