Voting Rules as Error-Correcting Codes
Abstract
We present the first model of optimal voting under adversarial noise. From this viewpoint, voting rules are seen as error-correcting codes: their goal is to correct errors in the input rankings and recover a ranking that is close to the ground truth. We derive worst-case bounds on the relation between the average accuracy of the input votes, and the accuracy of the output ranking. Empirical results from real data show that our approach produces significantly more accurate rankings than alternative approaches.
Cite
Text
Procaccia et al. "Voting Rules as Error-Correcting Codes." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V29I1.9292Markdown
[Procaccia et al. "Voting Rules as Error-Correcting Codes." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2015/procaccia2015aaai-voting/) doi:10.1609/AAAI.V29I1.9292BibTeX
@inproceedings{procaccia2015aaai-voting,
title = {{Voting Rules as Error-Correcting Codes}},
author = {Procaccia, Ariel D. and Shah, Nisarg and Zick, Yair},
booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2015},
pages = {1000-1006},
doi = {10.1609/AAAI.V29I1.9292},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2015/procaccia2015aaai-voting/}
}