A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation

Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, Nicolas Maudet

AAAI 2016 pp. 914-920

doi:10.1609/AAAI.V30I1.10116 /aaai/2016/bonzon2016aaai-comparative/

Abstract

Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently, a number of such semantics have been pro- posed independently, often associated with some desirable properties. However, there is no comparative study which takes a broader perspective. This is what we propose in this work. We provide a general comparison of all these semantics with respect to the proposed proper- ties. That allows to underline the differences of behavior between the existing semantics.

PDF AAAI Semantic Scholar

Cite

Text

Bonzon et al. "A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V30I1.10116

Markdown

[Bonzon et al. "A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2016/bonzon2016aaai-comparative/) doi:10.1609/AAAI.V30I1.10116

BibTeX

@inproceedings{bonzon2016aaai-comparative,
  title     = {{A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation}},
  author    = {Bonzon, Elise and Delobelle, Jérôme and Konieczny, Sébastien and Maudet, Nicolas},
  booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2016},
  pages     = {914-920},
  doi       = {10.1609/AAAI.V30I1.10116},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2016/bonzon2016aaai-comparative/}
}