Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

Abstract

The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumentative explanations in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation. We propose new defence and acceptability semantics, which operates on both attack and support relations, and use them to formalize two types of explanations, concise and strong explanations. We also show how to compute the explanations with Bipolar Dispute Trees.

Cite

Text

Zeng et al. "Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V33I01.330110079

Markdown

[Zeng et al. "Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks." AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019.](https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2019/zeng2019aaai-computing/) doi:10.1609/AAAI.V33I01.330110079

BibTeX

@inproceedings{zeng2019aaai-computing,
  title     = {{Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks}},
  author    = {Zeng, Zhiwei and Miao, Chunyan and Leung, Cyril and Shen, Zhiqi and Chin, Jing Jih},
  booktitle = {AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2019},
  pages     = {10079-10080},
  doi       = {10.1609/AAAI.V33I01.330110079},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/aaai/2019/zeng2019aaai-computing/}
}