From Gambits to Assurances: Game-Theoretic Integration of Safety and Learning for Interactive Robotics

Abstract

Autonomous robots are becoming more versatile and widespread in our daily lives. From autonomous vehicles to companion robots for senior care, these human-centric systems must demonstrate a high degree of reliability in order to build trust and, ultimately, deliver social value. How safe is safe enough for robots to be wholeheartedly trusted by society? Is it sufficient if an autonomous vehicle can avoid hitting a fallen cyclist 99.9% of the time? What if this rate can only be achieved by the vehicle always stopping and waiting for the human to move out of the way? I argue that, for trustworthy deployment of robots in human-populated space, we need to complement standard statistical methods with clear-cut robust safety assurances under a vetted set of operation conditions. We need runtime learning to minimize the robot’s performance loss during safety-enforcing maneuvers by reducing its inherent uncertainty induced by its human peers, for example, their intent (does a human driver want to merge, cut behind, or stay in the lane?) or response (if the robot comes closer, how will the human react?). We need to close the loop between the robot’s learning and decision-making so that it can optimize efficiency by anticipating how its ongoing interaction with the human may affect the evolving uncertainty, and ultimately, its long-term performance.