Pragmatic Fairness: Developing Policies with Outcome Disparity Control
Abstract
We introduce a causal framework for designing optimal policies that satisfy classes of fairness constraints. We take a pragmatic approach asking what we can do with an action space available from historical data, with no further experimentation and novel actions immediately available. We propose two different fairness constraints: a "moderation breaking" constraint which aims at reducing disparity in outcome levels across sensitive attributes to the extent the provided action space permits; and an "equal benefit" constraint which aims at distributing gain from the new and maximized policy equally across sensitive attribute levels, and thus at keeping pre-existing preferential treatment in place or avoiding the introduction of new disparity. We introduce practical methods for implementing the constraints and illustrate their uses on experiments with semi-synthetic models.
Cite
Text
Gultchin et al. "Pragmatic Fairness: Developing Policies with Outcome Disparity Control." Proceedings of the Third Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, 2024.Markdown
[Gultchin et al. "Pragmatic Fairness: Developing Policies with Outcome Disparity Control." Proceedings of the Third Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, 2024.](https://mlanthology.org/clear/2024/gultchin2024clear-pragmatic/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{gultchin2024clear-pragmatic,
title = {{Pragmatic Fairness: Developing Policies with Outcome Disparity Control}},
author = {Gultchin, Limor and Guo, Siyuan and Malek, Alan and Chiappa, Silvia and Silva, Ricardo},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Third Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning},
year = {2024},
pages = {243-264},
volume = {236},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/clear/2024/gultchin2024clear-pragmatic/}
}