Maximum Likelihood vs. Sequential Normalized Maximum Likelihood in On-Line Density Estimation
Abstract
The paper considers sequential prediction of individual sequences with log loss (online density estimation) using an exponential family of distributions. We first analyze the regret of the maximum likelihood (“follow the leader”) strategy. We find that this strategy is (1) suboptimal and (2) requires an additional assumption about boundedness of the data sequence. We then show that both problems can be be addressed by adding the currently predicted outcome to the calculation of the maximum likelihood, followed by normalization of the distribution. The strategy obtained in this way is known in the literature as the sequential normalized maximum likelihood or last-step minimax strategy. We show for the first time that for general exponential families, the regret is bounded by the familiar $(k/2) \log n$ and thus optimal up to $O(1)$. We also show the relationship to the Bayes strategy with Jeffreys’ prior.
Cite
Text
Kotłowski and Grünwald. "Maximum Likelihood vs. Sequential Normalized Maximum Likelihood in On-Line Density Estimation." Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, 2011.Markdown
[Kotłowski and Grünwald. "Maximum Likelihood vs. Sequential Normalized Maximum Likelihood in On-Line Density Estimation." Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, 2011.](https://mlanthology.org/colt/2011/kotowski2011colt-maximum/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{kotowski2011colt-maximum,
title = {{Maximum Likelihood vs. Sequential Normalized Maximum Likelihood in On-Line Density Estimation}},
author = {Kotłowski, Wojciech and Grünwald, Peter},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Learning Theory},
year = {2011},
pages = {457-476},
volume = {19},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/colt/2011/kotowski2011colt-maximum/}
}