Detection-Recovery and Detection-Refutation Gaps via Reductions from Planted Clique
Abstract
Planted Dense Subgraph (PDS) problem is a prototypical problem with a computational-statistical gap. It also exhibits an intriguing additional phenomenon: different tasks, such as detection or recovery, appear to have different computational limits. A detection-recovery gap for PDS was substantiated in the form of a precise conjecture given by Chen and Xu (2014) (based on the parameter values for which a convexified MLE succeeds), and then shown to hold for low-degree polynomial algorithms by Schramm and Wein (2022) and for MCMC algorithms for Ben Arous et al. (2020). In this paper we demonstrate that a slight variation of the Planted Clique Hypothesis with secret leakage (introduced in Brennan and Bresler (2020)), implies a detection-recovery gap for PDS. In the same vein, we also obtain a sharp lower bound for refutation, yielding a detection-refutation gap. Our methods build on the framework of Brennan and Bresler (2020) to construct average-case reductions mapping secret leakage Planted Clique to appropriate target problems.
Cite
Text
Bresler and Jiang. "Detection-Recovery and Detection-Refutation Gaps via Reductions from Planted Clique." Conference on Learning Theory, 2023.Markdown
[Bresler and Jiang. "Detection-Recovery and Detection-Refutation Gaps via Reductions from Planted Clique." Conference on Learning Theory, 2023.](https://mlanthology.org/colt/2023/bresler2023colt-detectionrecovery/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{bresler2023colt-detectionrecovery,
title = {{Detection-Recovery and Detection-Refutation Gaps via Reductions from Planted Clique}},
author = {Bresler, Guy and Jiang, Tianze},
booktitle = {Conference on Learning Theory},
year = {2023},
pages = {5850-5889},
volume = {195},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/colt/2023/bresler2023colt-detectionrecovery/}
}