Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approaches
Abstract
Learning-based image quality assessment (IQA) has made remarkable progress in the past decade, but nearly all consider the two key components—model and data—in relative isolation. Specifically, model-centric IQA focuses on developing "better" objective quality methods on fixed and extensively reused datasets, with a great danger of overfitting. Data-centric IQA involves conducting psychophysical experiments to construct "better" human-annotated datasets, which unfortunately ignores current IQA models during dataset creation. In this paper, we first design a series of experiments to probe computationally that such isolation of model and data impedes further progress of IQA. We then describe a computational framework that integrates model-centric and data-centric IQA. As a specific example, we design computational modules to quantify the sampling-worthiness of candidate images based on blind IQA (BIQA) model predictions and deep content-aware features. Experimental results show that the proposed sampling-worthiness module successfully spots diverse failures of the examined BIQA models, which are indeed worthy samples to be included in next-generation datasets.
Cite
Text
Cao et al. "Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approaches." Conference on Parsimony and Learning, 2024.Markdown
[Cao et al. "Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approaches." Conference on Parsimony and Learning, 2024.](https://mlanthology.org/cpal/2024/cao2024cpal-image/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{cao2024cpal-image,
title = {{Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approaches}},
author = {Cao, Peibei and Li, Dingquan and Ma, Kede},
booktitle = {Conference on Parsimony and Learning},
year = {2024},
pages = {529-541},
volume = {234},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/cpal/2024/cao2024cpal-image/}
}