Binary Morphology: Working in the Sampled Domain
Abstract
A description is given of the relationship between morphologically filtering and then sampling vs. sampling, and then morphologically filtering in the sampled domain. The authors also describe the relationship between morphologically filtering vs. sampling, morphologically filtering in the sampled domain, and then reconstructing. Unlike the standard communication sampling theory where for appropriately low-pass filtered images there is commutivity between sampling and filtering, this is not the case for appropriately morphologically simplified images. The relationship which does exist shows that the commutivity holds to within one sampling interval distance in the unsampled domain and to within two sampling intervals in the sampled domain.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Cite
Text
Haralick et al. "Binary Morphology: Working in the Sampled Domain." IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1988. doi:10.1109/CVPR.1988.196323Markdown
[Haralick et al. "Binary Morphology: Working in the Sampled Domain." IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1988.](https://mlanthology.org/cvpr/1988/haralick1988cvpr-binary/) doi:10.1109/CVPR.1988.196323BibTeX
@inproceedings{haralick1988cvpr-binary,
title = {{Binary Morphology: Working in the Sampled Domain}},
author = {Haralick, Robert M. and Zhuang, Xinhua and Lin, Charlotte and Lee, James S. J.},
booktitle = {IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},
year = {1988},
pages = {780-791},
doi = {10.1109/CVPR.1988.196323},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/cvpr/1988/haralick1988cvpr-binary/}
}