Two Causal Principles for Improving Visual Dialog

Abstract

This paper unravels the design tricks adopted by us, the champion team MReaL-BDAI, for Visual Dialog Challenge 2019: two causal principles for improving Visual Dialog (VisDial). By "improving", we mean that they can promote almost every existing VisDial model to the state-of-the-art performance on the leader-board. Such a major improvement is only due to our careful inspection on the causality behind the model and data, finding that the community has overlooked two causalities in VisDial. Intuitively, Principle 1 suggests: we should remove the direct input of the dialog history to the answer model, otherwise a harmful shortcut bias will be introduced; Principle 2 says: there is an unobserved confounder for history, question, and answer, leading to spurious correlations from training data. In particular, to remove the confounder suggested in Principle 2, we propose several causal intervention algorithms, which make the training fundamentally different from the traditional likelihood estimation. Note that the two principles are model-agnostic, so they are applicable in any VisDial model.

Cite

Text

Qi et al. "Two Causal Principles for Improving Visual Dialog." Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020. doi:10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01087

Markdown

[Qi et al. "Two Causal Principles for Improving Visual Dialog." Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020.](https://mlanthology.org/cvpr/2020/qi2020cvpr-two/) doi:10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01087

BibTeX

@inproceedings{qi2020cvpr-two,
  title     = {{Two Causal Principles for Improving Visual Dialog}},
  author    = {Qi, Jiaxin and Niu, Yulei and Huang, Jianqiang and Zhang, Hanwang},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},
  year      = {2020},
  doi       = {10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01087},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/cvpr/2020/qi2020cvpr-two/}
}