Arguing Machines: Human Supervision of Black Box AI Systems That Make Life-Critical Decisions
Abstract
We consider the paradigm of a black box AI system that makes life-critical decisions. We propose an “arguing machines” framework that pairs the primary AI system with a secondary one that is independently trained to perform the same task. We show that disagreement between the two systems, without any knowledge of underlying system design or operation, is sufficient to improve the accuracy of the overall system given human supervision over disagreements. We demonstrate this system in two applications: (1) image classification and (2) large-scale real-world semi-autonomous driving. For the first application, we apply this framework to image classification achieving a reduction from 8.0% to 2.8% top-5 error on ImageNet. For the second application, we apply this framework to Tesla Autopilot and demonstrate the ability to predict 90.4% of system disengagements that were labeled by human as challenging.
Cite
Text
Fridman et al. "Arguing Machines: Human Supervision of Black Box AI Systems That Make Life-Critical Decisions." IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2019. doi:10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00173Markdown
[Fridman et al. "Arguing Machines: Human Supervision of Black Box AI Systems That Make Life-Critical Decisions." IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2019.](https://mlanthology.org/cvprw/2019/fridman2019cvprw-arguing/) doi:10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00173BibTeX
@inproceedings{fridman2019cvprw-arguing,
title = {{Arguing Machines: Human Supervision of Black Box AI Systems That Make Life-Critical Decisions}},
author = {Fridman, Lex and Ding, Li and Jenik, Benedikt and Reimer, Bryan},
booktitle = {IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops},
year = {2019},
pages = {1335-1343},
doi = {10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00173},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/cvprw/2019/fridman2019cvprw-arguing/}
}