A Discussion of 'Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features'
Abstract
Distill articles are interactive publications and do not include traditional abstracts. This summary was written for the ML Anthology. Hosts a structured discussion of the paper 'Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features' by Ilyas et al., featuring six peer commentaries with new experiments and detailed author responses examining the role of non-robust features in neural networks.
Cite
Text
Engstrom et al. "A Discussion of 'Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features'." Distill, 2019. doi:10.23915/distill.00019Markdown
[Engstrom et al. "A Discussion of 'Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features'." Distill, 2019.](https://mlanthology.org/distill/2019/engstrom2019distill-discussion/) doi:10.23915/distill.00019BibTeX
@article{engstrom2019distill-discussion,
title = {{A Discussion of 'Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features'}},
author = {Engstrom, Logan and Gilmer, Justin and Goh, Gabriel and Hendrycks, Dan and Ilyas, Andrew and Madry, Aleksander and Nakano, Reiichiro and Nakkiran, Preetum and Santurkar, Shibani and Tran, Brandon and Tsipras, Dimitris and Wallace, Eric},
journal = {Distill},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.23915/distill.00019},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/distill/2019/engstrom2019distill-discussion/}
}