Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks
Abstract
We investigate the internal representations that a recurrent neural network (RNN) uses while learning to recognize a regular formal language. Specifically, we train a RNN on positive and negative examples from a regular language, and ask if there is a simple decoding function that maps states of this RNN to states of the minimal deterministic finite automaton (MDFA) for the language. Our experiments show that such a decoding function indeed exists, and that it maps states of the RNN not to MDFA states, but to states of an {\em abstraction} obtained by clustering small sets of MDFA states into ``''superstates''. A qualitative analysis reveals that the abstraction often has a simple interpretation. Overall, the results suggest a strong structural relationship between internal representations used by RNNs and finite automata, and explain the well-known ability of RNNs to recognize formal grammatical structure.
Cite
Text
Michalenko et al. "Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks ." International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.Markdown
[Michalenko et al. "Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks ." International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.](https://mlanthology.org/iclr/2019/michalenko2019iclr-representing/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{michalenko2019iclr-representing,
title = {{Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networks }},
author = {Michalenko, Joshua J. and Shah, Ameesh and Verma, Abhinav and Baraniuk, Richard G. and Chaudhuri, Swarat and Patel, Ankit B.},
booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},
year = {2019},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/iclr/2019/michalenko2019iclr-representing/}
}