The CoT Encyclopedia: Analyzing, Predicting, and Controlling How a Reasoning Model Will Think

Abstract

Long chain-of-thought (CoT) is an essential ingredient in effective usage of modern large language models, but our understanding of the reasoning strategies underlying these capabilities remains limited. While some prior works have attempted to categorize CoTs using predefined strategy types, such approaches are constrained by human intuition and fail to capture the full diversity of model behaviors. In this work, we introduce the CoT Encyclopedia, a bottom-up framework for analyzing and steering model reasoning. Our method automatically extracts diverse reasoning criteria from model-generated CoTs, embeds them into a semantic space, clusters them into representative categories, and derives contrastive rubrics to interpret reasoning behavior. Human evaluations show that this framework produces more interpretable and comprehensive analyses than existing methods. Moreover, we show that this understanding translates into measurable improvements on both problem-solving and safety benchmarks. We can predict which strategy a model is likely to use and guide it toward more effective alternatives. Finally, we show that training data format (e.g., free-form vs. multiple-choice) impacts reasoning far more than data domain, highlighting the importance of format-aware model design. In short, the CoT Encyclopedia turns reasoning from a black box into a controllable asset, enabling LLMs that think more clearly, perform more reliably, and act more safely.