Evaluation Methods for Topic Models
Abstract
A natural evaluation metric for statistical topic models is the probability of held-out documents given a trained model. While exact computation of this probability is intractable, several estimators for this probability have been used in the topic modeling literature, including the harmonic mean method and empirical likelihood method. In this paper, we demonstrate experimentally that commonly-used methods are unlikely to accurately estimate the probability of held-out documents, and propose two alternative methods that are both accurate and efficient.
Cite
Text
Wallach et al. "Evaluation Methods for Topic Models." International Conference on Machine Learning, 2009. doi:10.1145/1553374.1553515Markdown
[Wallach et al. "Evaluation Methods for Topic Models." International Conference on Machine Learning, 2009.](https://mlanthology.org/icml/2009/wallach2009icml-evaluation/) doi:10.1145/1553374.1553515BibTeX
@inproceedings{wallach2009icml-evaluation,
title = {{Evaluation Methods for Topic Models}},
author = {Wallach, Hanna M. and Murray, Iain and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan and Mimno, David M.},
booktitle = {International Conference on Machine Learning},
year = {2009},
pages = {1105-1112},
doi = {10.1145/1553374.1553515},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/icml/2009/wallach2009icml-evaluation/}
}