Minimizing the Maximal Loss: How and Why

Abstract

A commonly used learning rule is to approximately minimize the \emphaverage loss over the training set. Other learning algorithms, such as AdaBoost and hard-SVM, aim at minimizing the \emphmaximal loss over the training set. The average loss is more popular, particularly in deep learning, due to three main reasons. First, it can be conveniently minimized using online algorithms, that process few examples at each iteration. Second, it is often argued that there is no sense to minimize the loss on the training set too much, as it will not be reflected in the generalization loss. Last, the maximal loss is not robust to outliers. In this paper we describe and analyze an algorithm that can convert any online algorithm to a minimizer of the maximal loss. We show, theoretically and empirically, that in some situations better accuracy on the training set is crucial to obtain good performance on unseen examples. Last, we propose robust versions of the approach that can handle outliers.

Cite

Text

Shalev-Shwartz and Wexler. "Minimizing the Maximal Loss: How and Why." International Conference on Machine Learning, 2016.

Markdown

[Shalev-Shwartz and Wexler. "Minimizing the Maximal Loss: How and Why." International Conference on Machine Learning, 2016.](https://mlanthology.org/icml/2016/shalevshwartz2016icml-minimizing/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{shalevshwartz2016icml-minimizing,
  title     = {{Minimizing the Maximal Loss: How and Why}},
  author    = {Shalev-Shwartz, Shai and Wexler, Yonatan},
  booktitle = {International Conference on Machine Learning},
  year      = {2016},
  pages     = {793-801},
  volume    = {48},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/icml/2016/shalevshwartz2016icml-minimizing/}
}