Be Brief, Be to the Point, ... Be Seated or Relevant Responses in Man/Machine Conversation
Abstract
In the dialogue part of our system, we have tried to increase the user's possibilities to criticize the machine's results require explanations of them. The system must then provide a clear justification: either by furnishing the chain of reasoning or by asking a good question when it failed. The system must also be able to engage in a real dialogue, with more than one question/one answer. To do that, the system must build and use several kinds of representation: the reasoning, the topics and a model of the user, which is used to tailor the system's responses.
Cite
Text
Vilnat and Sabah. "Be Brief, Be to the Point, ... Be Seated or Relevant Responses in Man/Machine Conversation." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1985.Markdown
[Vilnat and Sabah. "Be Brief, Be to the Point, ... Be Seated or Relevant Responses in Man/Machine Conversation." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1985.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1985/vilnat1985ijcai-brief/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{vilnat1985ijcai-brief,
title = {{Be Brief, Be to the Point, ... Be Seated or Relevant Responses in Man/Machine Conversation}},
author = {Vilnat, Anne and Sabah, Gérard},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1985},
pages = {852-854},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1985/vilnat1985ijcai-brief/}
}