Constructive Induction on Decision Trees

Abstract

Selective induction techniques perform poorly when the features are inappropriate for the target concept. One solution is to have the learning system construct new features automatically; unfortunately feature construction is a difficult and poorly understood problem. In this paper we present a definition of feature construction in concept learning, and offer a framework for its study based on four aspects: detection, selection, generalization, and evaluation. This framework is used in the analysis of existing learning systems and as the basis for the design of a new system, citre. citre performs feature construction using decision trees and simple domain knowledge as constructive biases. Initial results on a set of spatial-dependent problems suggest the importance of domain knowledge and feature generalization, i.e., constructive induction. 1 Introduction Good representations are often crucial for solving difficult problems in AI. Finding suitable problem representations, however, ...

Cite

Text

Matheus and Rendell. "Constructive Induction on Decision Trees." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1989.

Markdown

[Matheus and Rendell. "Constructive Induction on Decision Trees." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1989.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1989/matheus1989ijcai-constructive/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{matheus1989ijcai-constructive,
  title     = {{Constructive Induction on Decision Trees}},
  author    = {Matheus, Christopher J. and Rendell, Larry A.},
  booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {1989},
  pages     = {645-650},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1989/matheus1989ijcai-constructive/}
}