On the Relation Between Truth Maintenance and Autoepistemic Logic

Abstract

In a recent paper, Konolige has introduced a new version of autoepistemic logic (AEL), which is based on a strong notion of groundedness. We show that it is well-suited for formalizing the concept of justified belief in a non-monotonic truth maintenance system (TMS). If we consider the justifications of a TMS as formulae of the form it computes the set of non-modal atoms of a strongly grounded AEL-extension. It is shown that a variant of Dressler's encoding of nonmonotonic justifications in an assumptionbased TMS is correct, and thus also inherits the AEL semantics We argue that more work is needed to come to a better understanding of backtracking routines and so-called nogood inferences, which are identified as sources of ungrounded conclusions. These results contribute to bridging the gap between theory and implementation in the field of nonmonotonic reasoning

Cite

Text

Reinfrank et al. "On the Relation Between Truth Maintenance and Autoepistemic Logic." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1989.

Markdown

[Reinfrank et al. "On the Relation Between Truth Maintenance and Autoepistemic Logic." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1989.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1989/reinfrank1989ijcai-relation/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{reinfrank1989ijcai-relation,
  title     = {{On the Relation Between Truth Maintenance and Autoepistemic Logic}},
  author    = {Reinfrank, Michael and Dressler, Oskar and Brewka, Gerhard},
  booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {1989},
  pages     = {1206-1212},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1989/reinfrank1989ijcai-relation/}
}