Learning to Reason: The Non-Monotonic Case
Abstract
We suggest a new approach for the study of the nonmonotonicity of human commonsense reasoning. The two main premises that underlie this work are that commonsense reasoning is an inductive phenomenon, and that missing information in the interaction of the agent with the environment may be as informative for future interactions as observed information. This intuition is formalized and the problem of reasoning from incomplete information is presented as a problem of learning attribute functions over a generalized domain. We consider examples that illustrate various aspects of the non-monotonic reasoning phenomena, which have been used over the years as "bench-marks" for various formalisms, and translate them into Learning to Reason problems. We demonstrate that these have concise representations over the generalized domain and prove that these representations can be learned efficiently. The framework developed suggests an "operational " approach to studying reasoning that is nevertheless ...
Cite
Text
Roth. "Learning to Reason: The Non-Monotonic Case." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.Markdown
[Roth. "Learning to Reason: The Non-Monotonic Case." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1995/roth1995ijcai-learning/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{roth1995ijcai-learning,
title = {{Learning to Reason: The Non-Monotonic Case}},
author = {Roth, Dan},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1995},
pages = {1178-1184},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/1995/roth1995ijcai-learning/}
}