ML Anthology

Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken
IJCAI 2011 pp. 1021-1026
doi:10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175 /ijcai/2011/modgil2011ijcai-revisiting/

Abstract

The ASPIC+ framework is intermediate in abstraction between Dung's argumentation framework and concrete instantiating logics. This paper generalises ASPIC+ to accommodate classical logic instantiations, and adopts a new proposal for evaluating extensions: attacks are used to define the notion of conflict-free sets, while the defeats obtained by applying preferences to attacks, are exclusively used to determine the acceptability of arguments. Key properties and rationality postulates are then shown to hold for the new framework.

PDF IJCAI Semantic Scholar

Cite

Text

Modgil and Prakken. "Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011. doi:10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175

Markdown

[Modgil and Prakken. "Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2011/modgil2011ijcai-revisiting/) doi:10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175

BibTeX

@inproceedings{modgil2011ijcai-revisiting,
  title     = {{Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation}},
  author    = {Modgil, Sanjay and Prakken, Henry},
  booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2011},
  pages     = {1021-1026},
  doi       = {10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2011/modgil2011ijcai-revisiting/}
}