Tradeoffs Between Incentive Mechanisms in Boolean Games
Abstract
Two incentive mechanisms for Boolean games were proposed recently - taxation schemes and side payments. Both mechanisms have been shown to be able to secure a pure Nash equilibrium (PNE) for Boolean games. A complete characterization of outcomes that can be transformed to PNEs is given for each of the two incentive mechanisms. Side payments are proved to be a weaker mechanism in the sense that the outcomes that they can transform to PNEs are a subset of those transformable by taxation. A family of social-network-based Boolean games, which demonstrates the differences between the two mechanisms for securing a PNE, is presented. A distributed search algorithm for finding the side payments needed for securing a PNE is proposed. An empirical evaluation demonstrates the properties of the two mechanisms on the family of social-network-based Boolean games.
Cite
Text
Levit et al. "Tradeoffs Between Incentive Mechanisms in Boolean Games." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.Markdown
[Levit et al. "Tradeoffs Between Incentive Mechanisms in Boolean Games." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2015/levit2015ijcai-tradeoffs/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{levit2015ijcai-tradeoffs,
title = {{Tradeoffs Between Incentive Mechanisms in Boolean Games}},
author = {Levit, Vadim and Komarovsky, Zohar and Grinshpoun, Tal and Meisels, Amnon},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2015},
pages = {68-74},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2015/levit2015ijcai-tradeoffs/}
}