Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Extended Abstract
Abstract
We review a recently introduced model in which each of a number of agents is endowed with an abstract argumentation framework reflecting her individual views regarding a given set of arguments. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a situation is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentation framework is induced by a combination of, first, some basic factual information and, second, the personal preferences of the agent concerned. We treat this question of rationalisability of a profile as an algorithmic problem and identify tractable and intractable cases. This is useful for understanding what types of profiles can reasonably be expected to occur in a multiagent system.
Cite
Text
Airiau et al. "Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Extended Abstract." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/665Markdown
[Airiau et al. "Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Extended Abstract." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2017/airiau2017ijcai-rationalisation/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/665BibTeX
@inproceedings{airiau2017ijcai-rationalisation,
title = {{Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Extended Abstract}},
author = {Airiau, Stéphane and Bonzon, Elise and Endriss, Ulle and Maudet, Nicolas and Rossit, Julien},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2017},
pages = {4776-4780},
doi = {10.24963/IJCAI.2017/665},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2017/airiau2017ijcai-rationalisation/}
}