ML Anthology

A Study of Unrestricted Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

Ringo Baumann, Christof Spanring
IJCAI 2017 pp. 807-813
doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/112 /ijcai/2017/baumann2017ijcai-study/

Abstract

Research in abstract argumentation typically per-tains to finite argumentation frameworks (AFs). Ac-tual or potential infinite AFs frequently occur if theyare used for the purpose of nonmonotonic entail-ment, so-called instantiation-based argumentation, or if they are involved as modeling tool for dia-logues, n-person-games or action sequences. Apartfrom these practical cases a profound analysis yieldsa better understanding of how the nonmonotonic the-ory of abstract argumentation works in general. Inthis paper we study a bunch of abstract propertieslike SCC-recursiveness, expressiveness or intertrans-latability for unrestricted AFs.

PDF IJCAI Semantic Scholar

Cite

Text

Baumann and Spanring. "A Study of Unrestricted Abstract Argumentation Frameworks." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/112

Markdown

[Baumann and Spanring. "A Study of Unrestricted Abstract Argumentation Frameworks." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2017/baumann2017ijcai-study/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/112

BibTeX

@inproceedings{baumann2017ijcai-study,
  title     = {{A Study of Unrestricted Abstract Argumentation Frameworks}},
  author    = {Baumann, Ringo and Spanring, Christof},
  booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2017},
  pages     = {807-813},
  doi       = {10.24963/IJCAI.2017/112},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2017/baumann2017ijcai-study/}
}