Safe Inductions: An Algebraic Study
Abstract
In many knowledge representation formalisms, a constructive semantics is defined based on sequential applications of rules or of a semantic operator. These constructions often share the property that rule applications must be delayed until it is safe to do so: until it is known that the condition that triggers the rule will remain to hold. This intuition occurs for instance in the well-founded semantics of logic programs and in autoepistemic logic. In this paper, we formally define the safety criterion algebraically. We study properties of so-called safe inductions and apply our theory to logic programming and autoepistemic logic. For the latter, we show that safe inductions manage to capture the intended meaning of a class of theories on which all classical constructive semantics fail.
Cite
Text
Bogaerts et al. "Safe Inductions: An Algebraic Study." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/119Markdown
[Bogaerts et al. "Safe Inductions: An Algebraic Study." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2017/bogaerts2017ijcai-safe/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2017/119BibTeX
@inproceedings{bogaerts2017ijcai-safe,
title = {{Safe Inductions: An Algebraic Study}},
author = {Bogaerts, Bart and Vennekens, Joost and Denecker, Marc},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2017},
pages = {859-865},
doi = {10.24963/IJCAI.2017/119},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2017/bogaerts2017ijcai-safe/}
}