Egalitarian Committee Scoring Rules

Abstract

We introduce and study the class of egalitarian variants of committee scoring rules, where instead of summing up the scores that voters assign to committees---as is done in the utilitarian variants---the score of a committee is taken to be the lowest score assigned to it by any voter. We focus on five rules, which are egalitarian analogues of SNTV, the k-Borda rule, the Chamberlin--Courant rule, the Bloc rule, and the Pessimist rule. We establish their computational complexity, provide their initial axiomatic study, and perform experiments to represent the action of these rules graphically.

Cite

Text

Aziz et al. "Egalitarian Committee Scoring Rules." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2018/8

Markdown

[Aziz et al. "Egalitarian Committee Scoring Rules." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2018/aziz2018ijcai-egalitarian/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2018/8

BibTeX

@inproceedings{aziz2018ijcai-egalitarian,
  title     = {{Egalitarian Committee Scoring Rules}},
  author    = {Aziz, Haris and Faliszewski, Piotr and Grofman, Bernard and Slinko, Arkadii and Talmon, Nimrod},
  booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2018},
  pages     = {56-62},
  doi       = {10.24963/IJCAI.2018/8},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2018/aziz2018ijcai-egalitarian/}
}