Unsatisfiability Proofs for Weight 16 Codewords in Lam's Problem

Abstract

In the 1970s and 1980s, searches performed by L. Carter, C. Lam, L. Thiel, and S. Swiercz showed that projective planes of order ten with weight 16 codewords do not exist. These searches required highly specialized and optimized computer programs and required about 2,000 hours of computing time on mainframe and supermini computers. In 2010, these searches were verified by D. Roy using an optimized C program and 16,000 hours on a cluster of desktop machines. We performed a verification of these searches by reducing the problem to the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT). Our verification uses the cube-and-conquer SAT solving paradigm, symmetry breaking techniques using the computer algebra system Maple, and a result of Carter that there are ten nonisomorphic cases to check. Our searches completed in about 30 hours on a desktop machine and produced nonexistence proofs of about 1 terabyte in the DRAT (deletion resolution asymmetric tautology) format.

Cite

Text

Bright et al. "Unsatisfiability Proofs for Weight 16 Codewords in Lam's Problem." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2020/203

Markdown

[Bright et al. "Unsatisfiability Proofs for Weight 16 Codewords in Lam's Problem." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2020/bright2020ijcai-unsatisfiability/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2020/203

BibTeX

@inproceedings{bright2020ijcai-unsatisfiability,
  title     = {{Unsatisfiability Proofs for Weight 16 Codewords in Lam's Problem}},
  author    = {Bright, Curtis and Cheung, Kevin K. H. and Stevens, Brett and Kotsireas, Ilias S. and Ganesh, Vijay},
  booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {2020},
  pages     = {1460-1466},
  doi       = {10.24963/IJCAI.2020/203},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2020/bright2020ijcai-unsatisfiability/}
}