Tight Approximation for Proportional Approval Voting
Abstract
In approval-based multiwinner elections, we are given a set of voters, a set of candidates, and, for each voter, a set of candidates approved by the voter. The goal is to find a committee of size k that maximizes the total utility of the voters. In this paper, we study approximability of Thiele rules, which are known to be NP-hard to solve exactly. We provide a tight polynomial time approximation algorithm for a natural class of geometrically dominant weights that includes such voting rules as Proportional Approval Voting or p-Geometric. The algorithm is relatively simple: first we solve a linear program and then we round a solution by employing a framework called pipage rounding due to Ageev and Sviridenko (2004) and Calinescu et al. (2011). We provide a matching lower bound via a reduction from the Label Cover problem. Moreover, assuming a conjecture called Gap-ETH, we show that better approximation ratio cannot be obtained even in time f(k)*pow(n,o(k)).
Cite
Text
Dudycz et al. "Tight Approximation for Proportional Approval Voting." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2020/39Markdown
[Dudycz et al. "Tight Approximation for Proportional Approval Voting." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2020/dudycz2020ijcai-tight/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2020/39BibTeX
@inproceedings{dudycz2020ijcai-tight,
title = {{Tight Approximation for Proportional Approval Voting}},
author = {Dudycz, Szymon and Manurangsi, Pasin and Marcinkowski, Jan and Sornat, Krzysztof},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2020},
pages = {276-282},
doi = {10.24963/IJCAI.2020/39},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2020/dudycz2020ijcai-tight/}
}