Two Forms of Responsibility in Strategic Games
Abstract
The paper studies two forms of responsibility, seeing to it and being blamable, in the setting of strategic games with imperfect information. The paper shows that being blamable is definable through seeing to it, but not the other way around. In addition, it proposes a bimodal logical system that describes the interplay between the seeing to it modality and the individual knowledge modality.
Cite
Text
Naumov and Tao. "Two Forms of Responsibility in Strategic Games." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021. doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2021/274Markdown
[Naumov and Tao. "Two Forms of Responsibility in Strategic Games." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2021/naumov2021ijcai-two/) doi:10.24963/IJCAI.2021/274BibTeX
@inproceedings{naumov2021ijcai-two,
title = {{Two Forms of Responsibility in Strategic Games}},
author = {Naumov, Pavel and Tao, Jia},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2021},
pages = {1989-1995},
doi = {10.24963/IJCAI.2021/274},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2021/naumov2021ijcai-two/}
}