What Is Best for Students, Numerical Scores or Letter Grades?
Abstract
Reasoning paths are reliable information in knowledge graph completion (KGC) in which algorithms can find strong clues of the actual relation between entities. However, in real-world applications, it is difficult to guarantee that computationally affordable paths exist toward all candidate entities. According to our observation, the prediction accuracy drops significantly when paths are absent. To make the proposed algorithm more stable against the missing path circumstances, we introduce soft reasoning paths. Concretely, a specific learnable latent path embedding is concatenated to each relation to help better model the characteristics of the corresponding paths. The combination of the relation and the corresponding learnable embedding is termed a soft path in our paper. By aligning the soft paths with the reasoning paths, a learnable embedding is guided to learn a generalized path representation of the corresponding relation. In addition, we introduce a hierarchical ranking strategy to make full use of information about the entity, relation, path, and soft path to help improve both the efficiency and accuracy of the model. Extensive experimental results illustrate that our algorithm outperforms the compared state-of-the-art algorithms by a notable margin. Our code will be released at https://github.com/7HHHHH/SRP-KGC.
Cite
Text
Micha et al. "What Is Best for Students, Numerical Scores or Letter Grades?." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024. doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/327Markdown
[Micha et al. "What Is Best for Students, Numerical Scores or Letter Grades?." International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024.](https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2024/micha2024ijcai-best/) doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/327BibTeX
@inproceedings{micha2024ijcai-best,
title = {{What Is Best for Students, Numerical Scores or Letter Grades?}},
author = {Micha, Evi and Sekar, Shreyas and Shah, Nisarg},
booktitle = {International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2024},
pages = {2949-2957},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2024/327},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/ijcai/2024/micha2024ijcai-best/}
}