Decidability and Undecidability Results for Propositional Schemata
Abstract
We define a logic of propositional formula schemata adding to the syntax of propositional logic indexed propositions (e.g., pi) and iterated connectives ∨ or ∧ ranging over intervals parameterized by arithmetic variables (e.g., ∧i-1n pi, where n is a parameter). The satisfiability problem is shown to be undecidable for this new logic, but we introduce a very general class of schemata, called bound-linear, for which this problem becomes decidable. This result is obtained by reduction to a particular class of schemata called regular, for which we provide a sound and complete terminating proof procedure. This schemata calculus (called STAB) allows one to capture proof patterns corresponding to a large class of problems specified in propositional logic. We also show that the satisfiability problem becomes again undecidable for slight extensions of this class, thus demonstrating that bound-linear schemata represent a good compromise between expressivity and decidability
Cite
Text
Aravantinos et al. "Decidability and Undecidability Results for Propositional Schemata." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2011. doi:10.1613/JAIR.3351Markdown
[Aravantinos et al. "Decidability and Undecidability Results for Propositional Schemata." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2011.](https://mlanthology.org/jair/2011/aravantinos2011jair-decidability/) doi:10.1613/JAIR.3351BibTeX
@article{aravantinos2011jair-decidability,
title = {{Decidability and Undecidability Results for Propositional Schemata}},
author = {Aravantinos, Vincent and Caferra, Ricardo and Peltier, Nicolas},
journal = {Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},
year = {2011},
pages = {599-656},
doi = {10.1613/JAIR.3351},
volume = {40},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/jair/2011/aravantinos2011jair-decidability/}
}