Maximisation of Admissible Multi-Objective Heuristics
Abstract
In multi-objective (MO) heuristic search, solution costs, as well as heuristic values, are sets of multi-dimensional cost vectors, representing possible non-dominated trade-offs between objectives. The maximum of two or more such vector sets, which is an important operation in creating informative admissible MO heuristics, can be defined in several ways: Geißer et al. recently proposed two MO maximum operators, the component-wise maximum (comax) and the anti-dominance maximum (admax), which represent different trade-offs between informativeness and computational cost. We show that the anti-dominance maximum is not admissibility-preserving, and propose an alternative, the “select one” maximum (somax). We also show that the comax operator is the greatest admissibility-preserving MO maximum, and briefly investigate its efficient implementation. The conclusion of our experimental results is that somax achieves a trade-off similar to that intended with admax – cheaper to compute but less informed – also when compared to an improved comax implementation.
Cite
Text
Haslum and Wang. "Maximisation of Admissible Multi-Objective Heuristics." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2023. doi:10.1613/JAIR.1.14861Markdown
[Haslum and Wang. "Maximisation of Admissible Multi-Objective Heuristics." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2023.](https://mlanthology.org/jair/2023/haslum2023jair-maximisation/) doi:10.1613/JAIR.1.14861BibTeX
@article{haslum2023jair-maximisation,
title = {{Maximisation of Admissible Multi-Objective Heuristics}},
author = {Haslum, Patrik and Wang, Ryan Xiao},
journal = {Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},
year = {2023},
pages = {619-639},
doi = {10.1613/JAIR.1.14861},
volume = {78},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/jair/2023/haslum2023jair-maximisation/}
}