Finite State Automata That Recurrent Cascade-Correlation Cannot Represent
Abstract
This paper relates the computational power of Fahlman' s Recurrent Cascade Correlation (RCC) architecture to that of fInite state automata (FSA). While some recurrent networks are FSA equivalent, RCC is not. The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the RCC architecture in the form of a proof describing a large class of FSA which cannot be realized by RCC.
Cite
Text
Kremer. "Finite State Automata That Recurrent Cascade-Correlation Cannot Represent." Neural Information Processing Systems, 1995.Markdown
[Kremer. "Finite State Automata That Recurrent Cascade-Correlation Cannot Represent." Neural Information Processing Systems, 1995.](https://mlanthology.org/neurips/1995/kremer1995neurips-finite/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{kremer1995neurips-finite,
title = {{Finite State Automata That Recurrent Cascade-Correlation Cannot Represent}},
author = {Kremer, Stefan C.},
booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems},
year = {1995},
pages = {612-618},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/neurips/1995/kremer1995neurips-finite/}
}