Validity Estimates for Loopy Belief Propagation on Binary Real-World Networks
Abstract
We introduce a computationally efficient method to estimate the valid- ity of the BP method as a function of graph topology, the connectiv- ity strength, frustration and network size. We present numerical results that demonstrate the correctness of our estimates for the uniform random model and for a real-world network ("C. Elegans"). Although the method is restricted to pair-wise interactions, no local evidence (zero "biases") and binary variables, we believe that its predictions correctly capture the limitations of BP for inference and MAP estimation on arbitrary graphi- cal models. Using this approach, we find that BP always performs better than MF. Especially for large networks with broad degree distributions (such as scale-free networks) BP turns out to significantly outperform MF.
Cite
Text
Mooij and Kappen. "Validity Estimates for Loopy Belief Propagation on Binary Real-World Networks." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004.Markdown
[Mooij and Kappen. "Validity Estimates for Loopy Belief Propagation on Binary Real-World Networks." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004.](https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2004/mooij2004neurips-validity/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{mooij2004neurips-validity,
title = {{Validity Estimates for Loopy Belief Propagation on Binary Real-World Networks}},
author = {Mooij, Joris M. and Kappen, Hilbert J.},
booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems},
year = {2004},
pages = {945-952},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2004/mooij2004neurips-validity/}
}