Ideal Observers for Detecting Motion: Correspondence Noise

Abstract

We derive a Bayesian Ideal Observer (BIO) for detecting motion and solving the correspondence problem. We obtain Barlow and Tripathy’s classic model as an approximation. Our psychophysical experiments show that the trends of human performance are similar to the Bayesian Ideal, but overall human performance is far worse. We investigate ways to degrade the Bayesian Ideal but show that even extreme degradations do not approach human performance. Instead we propose that humans perform motion tasks using generic, general purpose, models of motion. We perform more psychophysical experiments which are consistent with humans using a Slow-and-Smooth model and which rule out an alterna- tive model using Slowness.

Cite

Text

Lu and Yuille. "Ideal Observers for Detecting Motion: Correspondence Noise." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2005.

Markdown

[Lu and Yuille. "Ideal Observers for Detecting Motion: Correspondence Noise." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2005.](https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2005/lu2005neurips-ideal/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{lu2005neurips-ideal,
  title     = {{Ideal Observers for Detecting Motion: Correspondence Noise}},
  author    = {Lu, Hongjing and Yuille, Alan L.},
  booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems},
  year      = {2005},
  pages     = {827-834},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2005/lu2005neurips-ideal/}
}