Empirical Models of Spiking in Neural Populations

Abstract

Neurons in the neocortex code and compute as part of a locally interconnected population. Large-scale multi-electrode recording makes it possible to access these population processes empirically by fitting statistical models to unaveraged data. What statistical structure best describes the concurrent spiking of cells within a local network? We argue that in the cortex, where firing exhibits extensive correlations in both time and space and where a typical sample of neurons still reflects only a very small fraction of the local population, the most appropriate model captures shared variability by a low-dimensional latent process evolving with smooth dynamics, rather than by putative direct coupling. We test this claim by comparing a latent dynamical model with realistic spiking observations to coupled generalised linear spike-response models (GLMs) using cortical recordings. We find that the latent dynamical approach outperforms the GLM in terms of goodness-of-fit, and reproduces the temporal correlations in the data more accurately. We also compare models whose observations models are either derived from a Gaussian or point-process models, finding that the non-Gaussian model provides slightly better goodness-of-fit and more realistic population spike counts.

Cite

Text

Macke et al. "Empirical Models of Spiking in Neural Populations." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011.

Markdown

[Macke et al. "Empirical Models of Spiking in Neural Populations." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011.](https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2011/macke2011neurips-empirical/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{macke2011neurips-empirical,
  title     = {{Empirical Models of Spiking in Neural Populations}},
  author    = {Macke, Jakob H. and Buesing, Lars and Cunningham, John P. and Yu, Byron M. and Shenoy, Krishna V. and Sahani, Maneesh},
  booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems},
  year      = {2011},
  pages     = {1350-1358},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2011/macke2011neurips-empirical/}
}