Qualitative Mechanism Independence

Abstract

We define what it means for a joint probability distribution to be compatible with aset of independent causal mechanisms, at a qualitative level—or, more precisely with a directed hypergraph $\mathcal A$, which is the qualitative structure of a probabilistic dependency graph (PDG). When A represents a qualitative Bayesian network, QIM-compatibility with $\mathcal A$ reduces to satisfying the appropriate conditional independencies. But giving semantics to hypergraphs using QIM-compatibility lets us do much more. For one thing, we can capture functional dependencies. For another, we can capture important aspects of causality using compatibility: we can use compatibility to understand cyclic causal graphs, and to demonstrate structural compatibility, we must essentially produce a causal model. Finally, compatibility has deep connections to information theory. Applying compatibility to cyclic structures helps to clarify a longstanding conceptual issue in information theory.

Cite

Text

Richardson et al. "Qualitative Mechanism Independence." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. doi:10.52202/079017-2219

Markdown

[Richardson et al. "Qualitative Mechanism Independence." Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024.](https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2024/richardson2024neurips-qualitative/) doi:10.52202/079017-2219

BibTeX

@inproceedings{richardson2024neurips-qualitative,
  title     = {{Qualitative Mechanism Independence}},
  author    = {Richardson, Oliver E. and Peters, Spencer and Halpern, Joseph Y.},
  booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems},
  year      = {2024},
  doi       = {10.52202/079017-2219},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2024/richardson2024neurips-qualitative/}
}