Are Pixel-Wise Metrics Reliable for Computerized Tomography Reconstruction?

Abstract

Widely adopted evaluation metrics for sparse-view CT reconstruction, such as Structural Similarity Index Measure and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio, prioritize pixel-wise fidelity but often fail to capture the completeness of critical anatomical structures, particularly small or thin regions that are easily missed. To address this limitation, we propose a suite of novel anatomy-aware evaluation metrics designed to assess structural completeness across anatomical structures, including large organs, small organs, intestines, and vessels. Building on these metrics, we introduce CARE, a Completeness-Aware Reconstruction Enhancement framework that incorporates structural penalties during training to encourage anatomical preservation of significant structures. CARE is model-agnostic and can be seamlessly integrated into analytical, implicit, and generative methods. When applied to these methods, CARE substantially improves structural completeness in CT reconstructions, achieving up to **32%** improvement for large organs, **22%** for small organs, **40%** for intestines, and **36%** for vessels.

Cite

Text

Lin et al. "Are Pixel-Wise Metrics Reliable for Computerized Tomography Reconstruction?." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025.

Markdown

[Lin et al. "Are Pixel-Wise Metrics Reliable for Computerized Tomography Reconstruction?." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025.](https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2025/lin2025neurips-pixelwise/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{lin2025neurips-pixelwise,
  title     = {{Are Pixel-Wise Metrics Reliable for Computerized Tomography Reconstruction?}},
  author    = {Lin, Tianyu and Li, Xinran and Zhuang, Chuntung and Chen, Qi and Cai, Yuanhao and Ding, Kai and Yuille, Alan and Zhou, Zongwei},
  booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
  year      = {2025},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neurips/2025/lin2025neurips-pixelwise/}
}