Independent Mechanism Analysis and the Manifold Hypothesis

Abstract

Independent Mechanism Analysis (IMA) seeks to address non-identifiability in nonlinear Independent Component Analysis (ICA) by assuming that the Jacobian of the mixing function has orthogonal columns. As typical in ICA, previous work focused on the case with an equal number of latent components and observed mixtures. Here, we extend IMA to settings with a larger number of mixtures that reside on a manifold embedded in a higher-dimensional space—in line with the _manifold hypothesis_ in representation learning. For this setting, we show that IMA still circumvents several non-identifiability issues, suggesting that it can also be a beneficial principle for higher-dimensional observations when the manifold hypothesis holds. Further, we prove that the IMA principle is approximately satisfied with high probability (increasing with the number of observed mixtures) when the directions along which the latent components influence the observations are chosen independently at random. This provides a new and rigorous statistical interpretation of IMA.

Cite

Text

Ghosh et al. "Independent Mechanism Analysis and the Manifold Hypothesis." NeurIPS 2023 Workshops: CRL, 2023.

Markdown

[Ghosh et al. "Independent Mechanism Analysis and the Manifold Hypothesis." NeurIPS 2023 Workshops: CRL, 2023.](https://mlanthology.org/neuripsw/2023/ghosh2023neuripsw-independent/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{ghosh2023neuripsw-independent,
  title     = {{Independent Mechanism Analysis and the Manifold Hypothesis}},
  author    = {Ghosh, Shubhangi and Gresele, Luigi and von Kügelgen, Julius and Besserve, Michel and Schölkopf, Bernhard},
  booktitle = {NeurIPS 2023 Workshops: CRL},
  year      = {2023},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neuripsw/2023/ghosh2023neuripsw-independent/}
}