Equitable Access to Justice: Logical LLMs Show Promise

Abstract

The costs and complexity of the American judicial system limit access to legal solutions for many Americans. Large language models (LLMs) hold great potential to improve access to justice. However, a major challenge in applying AI and LLMs in legal contexts, where consistency and reliability are crucial, is the need for System 2 reasoning. In this paper, we explore the integration of LLMs with logic programming to enhance their ability to reason, bringing their strategic capabilities closer to that of a skilled lawyer. Our objective is to translate laws and contracts into logic programs that can be applied to specific legal cases, with a focus on insurance contracts. We demonstrate that while GPT-4o fails to encode a simple health insurance contract into logical code, the recently released OpenAI o1-preview model succeeds, exemplifying how LLMs with advanced System 2 reasoning capabilities can expand access to justice.

Cite

Text

Kant et al. "Equitable Access to Justice: Logical LLMs Show Promise." NeurIPS 2024 Workshops: Sys2-Reasoning, 2024.

Markdown

[Kant et al. "Equitable Access to Justice: Logical LLMs Show Promise." NeurIPS 2024 Workshops: Sys2-Reasoning, 2024.](https://mlanthology.org/neuripsw/2024/kant2024neuripsw-equitable/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{kant2024neuripsw-equitable,
  title     = {{Equitable Access to Justice: Logical LLMs Show Promise}},
  author    = {Kant, Manuj and Nabi, Marzieh and Kant, Manav and Carlson, Preston and Ma, Megan},
  booktitle = {NeurIPS 2024 Workshops: Sys2-Reasoning},
  year      = {2024},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neuripsw/2024/kant2024neuripsw-equitable/}
}