Toward Democracy Levels for AI

Abstract

There is increasing concern about the unilateral power of the organizations involved in the development, alignment, and governance of AI. Recent pilots — such as Meta’s *Community Forums* and Anthropic’s *Collective Constitutional AI* — have illustrated a promising direction, where democratic processes might be used to meaningfully improve public involvement and trust in critical decisions. However, there is no standard framework for evaluating such processes. In this paper, building on insights from the theory and practice of deliberative democracy, we provide a “Democracy Levels” framework for evaluating the degree to which decisions in a given domain are made democratically. The framework can be used (i) to define milestones in a roadmap for the democratic AI, pluralistic AI, and public AI ecosystems, (ii) to guide organizations that need to increase the legitimacy of their decisions on difficult AI governance questions, and (iii) as a rubric by those aiming to evaluate AI organizations and keep them accountable.

Cite

Text

Ovadya et al. "Toward Democracy Levels for AI." NeurIPS 2024 Workshops: Pluralistic-Alignment, 2024.

Markdown

[Ovadya et al. "Toward Democracy Levels for AI." NeurIPS 2024 Workshops: Pluralistic-Alignment, 2024.](https://mlanthology.org/neuripsw/2024/ovadya2024neuripsw-democracy/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{ovadya2024neuripsw-democracy,
  title     = {{Toward Democracy Levels for AI}},
  author    = {Ovadya, Aviv and Thorburn, Luke and Redman, Kyle and Devine, Flynn and Milli, Smitha and Revel, Manon and Konya, Andrew and Kasirzadeh, Atoosa},
  booktitle = {NeurIPS 2024 Workshops: Pluralistic-Alignment},
  year      = {2024},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/neuripsw/2024/ovadya2024neuripsw-democracy/}
}