A Reproducible and Realistic Evaluation of Partial Domain Adaptation Methods

Abstract

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) aims at classifying unlabeled target images leveraging source labeled ones. In the case of an extreme label shift scenario between the source and target domains, where we have extra source classes not present in the target domain, the UDA problem becomes a harder problem called Partial Domain Adaptation (PDA). While different methods have been developed to solve the PDA problem, most successful algorithms use model selection strategies that rely on target labels to find the best hyper-parameters and/or models along training. These strategies violate the main assumption in PDA: only unlabeled target domain samples are available. In addition, there are also experimental inconsistencies between developed methods - different architectures, hyper-parameter tuning, number of runs - yielding unfair comparisons. The main goal of this work is to provide a realistic evaluation of PDA methods under different model selection strategies and a consistent evaluation protocol. We evaluate 6 state-of-the-art PDA algorithms on 2 different real-world datasets using 7 different model selection strategies. Our two main findings are: (i) without target labels for model selection, the accuracy of the methods decreases up to 30 percentage points; (ii) only one method and model selection pair performs well on both datasets. Experiments were performed with our PyTorch framework, BenchmarkPDA, which we open source.