Bayesian Meta-Reasoning: Determining Model Adequacy from Within a Small World
Abstract
This paper presents a Bayesian framework for assessing the adequacy of a model without the necessity of explicitly enumerating a specific alternate model. A test statistic is developed for tracking the performance of the model across repeated problem instances. Asymptotic methods are used to derive an approximate distribution for the test statistic. When the model is rejected, the individual components of the test statistic can be used to guide search for an alternate model.
Cite
Text
Laskey. "Bayesian Meta-Reasoning: Determining Model Adequacy from Within a Small World." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1992. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4832-8287-9.50026-8Markdown
[Laskey. "Bayesian Meta-Reasoning: Determining Model Adequacy from Within a Small World." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1992.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1992/laskey1992uai-bayesian/) doi:10.1016/B978-1-4832-8287-9.50026-8BibTeX
@inproceedings{laskey1992uai-bayesian,
title = {{Bayesian Meta-Reasoning: Determining Model Adequacy from Within a Small World}},
author = {Laskey, Kathryn B.},
booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1992},
pages = {155-158},
doi = {10.1016/B978-1-4832-8287-9.50026-8},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1992/laskey1992uai-bayesian/}
}